<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek Trailer &amp; Viral Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tubbygaijin.co.uk/blog/2008/01/23/star-trek-trailer-viral-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tubbygaijin.co.uk/blog/general/star-trek-trailer-viral-site/</link>
	<description>Web Designer, Game Developer, Japan Lover &#38; Gunpla maniac, basically a massive geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: neillans</title>
		<link>http://www.tubbygaijin.co.uk/blog/general/star-trek-trailer-viral-site/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>neillans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naffworld.co.uk/blog/?p=49#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Damn - you are spot on! Ok, you are the true geek ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn &#8211; you are spot on! Ok, you are the true geek <img src='http://www.tubbygaijin.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.tubbygaijin.co.uk/blog/general/star-trek-trailer-viral-site/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naffworld.co.uk/blog/?p=49#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I hate to disagree (the geeks really gonna come out now!) but Voyager was the only ship that could land on a planet, the others could go into atmospheres but not for very long. And the original enterprise was built a good 90yrs before that. 

Basically the problem is the writers are pretty shitty and don&#039;t seem to have much respect for the source material! What they&#039;ve allegedly done to Kirks kobayashi maru test makes him into the worst kind of scum!

God I&#039;m a geek...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to disagree (the geeks really gonna come out now!) but Voyager was the only ship that could land on a planet, the others could go into atmospheres but not for very long. And the original enterprise was built a good 90yrs before that. </p>
<p>Basically the problem is the writers are pretty shitty and don&#8217;t seem to have much respect for the source material! What they&#8217;ve allegedly done to Kirks kobayashi maru test makes him into the worst kind of scum!</p>
<p>God I&#8217;m a geek&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neillans</title>
		<link>http://www.tubbygaijin.co.uk/blog/general/star-trek-trailer-viral-site/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>neillans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naffworld.co.uk/blog/?p=49#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Well, I can kinda see where they are coming from with it being built on earth - dont forget, in TNG you see it taking off / landing on a handful of planets, so the physics must be ok ;) Shed load of power tho and if you were doing it, you would certainly build in orbit - easier to do for one. Maybe the cost of shipping parts &amp; people up there factored in tho. Sigh. Suppose it depends on the economics of the time. Ok, enough! :)

It does look a little ... off the standard Trek feel. I hope they don&#039;t ruin it ....

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can kinda see where they are coming from with it being built on earth &#8211; dont forget, in TNG you see it taking off / landing on a handful of planets, so the physics must be ok <img src='http://www.tubbygaijin.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Shed load of power tho and if you were doing it, you would certainly build in orbit &#8211; easier to do for one. Maybe the cost of shipping parts &amp; people up there factored in tho. Sigh. Suppose it depends on the economics of the time. Ok, enough! <img src='http://www.tubbygaijin.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It does look a little &#8230; off the standard Trek feel. I hope they don&#8217;t ruin it &#8230;.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

